angel

Resolution Being Submitted to the Convention
 of the Diocese of New York

 

To be presented to the Convention of the Diocese of New York,
meeting in Tarrytown
, November 10-11, 2006
(presented in the official form required by the Diocese of New York): 

Resolutions Affirming Diocesan Commitment that Candidates for Bishop
be chosen without regard for Sexual Orientation


Current list of Presenters and Endorsers:

 

The Rev. Dr. Frank Alagna
The Rev. Dr. Luis Barrios
The Rev. William A. F. Blasingame
The Rev. Jerry Brooks
The Rev. Peter R. Carey
The Rev. David Lee Carlson
The Rev. Barbara Crafton

Mr. Michael Cudney
The Rev. Dr. Mark B. Cyr
The Rev. John E. Denaro
The Rev. Randolph Lloyd Frew
Mr. Robert J. Frisby
Nell Braxton Gibson
The Rev. Dr. William A. Greenlaw
The Rev. Tobias Haller
The Rev. E. Perren Hayes
The Rev. Dr. Raynor Hesse
The Rev. M. Therese Heyduck
The Rev. Geo. Anthony Hoeltzel
The Rev. Betty Hudson
The Rev. James B. Jeffrey
Mr. David Juhren
The Rev. Theodore Kanellakis
The Rev. Dr. Richard S. Kemmler
The Rev. Dr. Earl Kooperkamp
The Rev. Elizabeth G. Maxwell

The Rev. Richard McKeon, Jr.
Canon Michael J. McPherson
The Rev. Frank Morales
The Rev. Timothy L. Morehouse
Phil Nicholson
The Rev. Martha Overall
The Rev. K. Jeanne Person
The Rev. Brad Pfaff
Ms. Diane Pollard
Mr. Chad S. Rancourt

The Rev. Michael J. Relyea
The Rev. Barry M. Signorelli
The Rev. Floyd Monroe Stallings

The Rev. Susanna E. Williams
The Rev. K. Dennis Winslow
The Rev. Richard C. Witt
The Rev. Stephen Jay Yagerman
The Social Concerns Commission of the Diocese
                      of New York
The Vestry of the Church of the Good Shepherd
The Vestry of the Church of the Holy Apostles
WAKE UP click here for website

 

 

 

   [1]  RESOLVED, that the Diocese of New York reaffirms its earlier positions that “all baptized, believing, and faithful persons, regardless of sexual orientation, are full members of the Body of Christ,” [1999] and that “the Standing Committee and Commission on Ministry ought not raise the issue [of the sexual preference of a candidate for ordination] in their consideration of a candidate’s fitness,” [1978]; and be it further
 

   [2]  RESOLVED, that, notwithstanding Resolution B-033 of the 75th General Convention of the Episcopal Church that calls upon Bishops with jurisdiction and Standing Committees "...to exercise restraint by not consenting to the consecration of any candidate to the episcopate whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church and will lead to further strains on communion," this 230th Convention of the Diocese of New York calls upon the Bishop of New York and the Standing Committee of this Diocese nevertheless to uphold the canons of our church and the resolutions of this Diocese in both letter and spirit and to consider irrelevant the sexual orientation of candidates when considering consents to the ordination and consecration of Bishops-elect.
 

 

Explanation of the Resolutions Disassociating the Diocese of New York
from 2006 General Convention Resolution B-033 

Simple justice and fidelity to our own resolutions and canons are what drive these resolutions. It is time to stand and say clearly and directly that we must be faithful to our understanding of the Gospel in the Episcopal Church.

 The last day of General Convention, 2006, saw Resolution B-033 pass under most unusual circumstances.  We were told it was to preserve our “place at the table” and to enable the “listening process” to continue in the Anglican Communion. Yet, within minutes of its passage and in countless ways since, it has become ever clearer that our place at the table is not secure and the “listening process” is only for us to “repent” if unity is to be remotely possible. Gay and lesbian faithful are once again being asked to “wait” open-endedly.

To paraphrase Jeremiah, we hear “unity, unity, when there is no unity.” Ever-larger numbers of people who believe in an inclusive church are saying no more appeasement, no more incessant waiting on what seems a process without end.

While B-033 has no status as a canon, it is already being misinterpreted and treated as if it did.  This is a clear and present danger we must address.