angel

Sermons
 

Sermon at The Church of the Holy Apostles, New York City,
October 15, 2006, The Nineteenth Sunday of Pentecost: Year B
The Reverend Barry M. Signorelli


Amos 5: 6 - 7, 10 - 15
Psalm 90
Hebrews 3: 1 - 6
Mark 10: 17 - 31

 

     “Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”

     In the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the Mother of Creation.  Amen.

    
I’ve always felt more than a little sorry for the rich man in today’s Gospel.  He claims to have done all the right things religiously for his whole life – paid his tithes, made the appointed sacrifices, kept the Ten Commandments, everything he was expected to do he did willingly.  And yet, something still wasn’t quite right for him; he felt as if there were something missing, some “thing” that he had yet to find or do, some final piece of the puzzle that he just couldn’t put his finger on.  And so, when he has the opportunity to consult Jesus, he kneels in supplication before him and asks to be told what it is that he’s searching for.  Jesus essentially tells him, you already know the answer – you’re aware of what the commandments are.  Yes, yes, the man replies, and I’ve done all that.  What happens next is to me one of the most poignant moments in Scripture: with this earnest man kneeling before him, so desperate to break through to self-understanding, having done everything he knew but still fallen short – Mark says that Jesus looked down on him and loved him.  Jesus was aware of the great turmoil going on in the man, and how much he wanted to find the final answer – and doubtless Jesus knew how hard it would be for him to hear that answer.  “…go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor…then come, follow me.”

     Oh, no! we can almost hear the rich man thinking; of all the things he could have said, why did it have to be that?  He couldn’t have said, build a shrine to God, or make a pilgrimage, or fast for forty days, something that’s within my reach to do?  He must have been heartsick, as if Jesus had told him to cut off an arm or a leg – and well, actually, that almost is what Jesus told him to do.  The rich man’s wealth had become so important to him that it practically was a part of his body, an integral piece of his self-identity.  It was just too great a sacrifice for him, and he went away knowing that his soul’s satisfaction would remain just out of reach.

     What is true for individuals can be true for nations, as well.  The prophet Amos had the unenviable task of preaching the harsh word in good times.  The 8th century B.C.E. was particularly prosperous for the northern kingdom of Israel; its territory stretched farther than ever before, its riches were vast, and its people were at peace.  Small wonder, then, that there was such resistance to Amos, who, after all, wasn’t even a native; he was born in the southern kingdom of Judah.  God called Amos to go north and preach at the shrine of Bethel, and the words he was given to pronounce fell hard on the ears of the Israelites.  Far from acknowledging that their wealth and prosperity were affirmations of God’s favor, Amos warned that without strict adherence to God’s will, all would be lost.  He denounced Israel’s reliance on military power, her indifference to injustices done to the poor, and her public piety, outwardly so lavish and extravagant, yet hollow and meaningless within.  (Does any of that sound familiar?)  So fierce was the opposition to Amos’ words that he was banished from Israel, and forbidden to prophesy there ever again.

     For both the Israel of Amos’ day, and for the rich man of Jesus’ day, prosperity was the stumbling-block keeping them from fully entering into relationship with God.  In both cases, they did the “right thing” outwardly, keeping the forms and appearances of religious observance, perhaps even with the best of intentions; yet without accepting that the inner workings of the heart trump all, it could never be enough.  Now, I’m not saying that wealth and prosperity are bad things, nor is religious observance – I’m especially not saying that on the day of the Ingathering of the Pledges!  Wealth gives one the ability to do much good in the world, and a rule of life based on religious principles and behaviors can give positive shape to our existence.  And God appreciates these things, more so than if we hoard our money and stumble through unstructured, unexamined lives.  But ultimately, what God wants is not our good behavior, but the yearning in our souls to merge with the divine will, so that whatever good flows from us into the world is not something we plan and execute, but rather springs naturally from a heart that brims with the desire to emulate God’s goodness and love.

     In order to do that, we must be free from whatever holds us back; we must allow nothing from our earthly life to take on more importance than the nature of our relationship with God.  In other words, what would we find most difficult to give up in order to find union with God?  And I don’t mean a Lenten kind of giving-up, setting aside for a period, but absolutely relinquishing forever?  What would feel to us like cutting off an arm or a leg in order to enter the Kingdom of Heaven?

     It may not be money; it could be a cherished prejudice, or a fondness for a honored place in the community.  It could be a reputation, a concern with “what the neighbors think.”  Perhaps it’s an ability to influence decisions, to impose our will through behind-the-scenes machinations; maybe it’s our overwhelming desire to be liked, or our reluctance to rock the boat.  It could even be a long-held fear, or the anxiety we treasure most.  Whenever any of these things becomes so important or essential to us that they interfere with our ability to respond to God – as Mark’s Gospel says, “immediately” – then we know we are in the same dire straits as that rich man who went away shocked and grieving.  And we hear the echo of the ancient challenge, “Choose this day whom you will serve.”

     Because ultimately, it’s about power.  The form that that power takes is inconsequential – what matters is that by holding on to our favorite stumbling-block, we are retaining personal power over our lives and our place in the cosmos.  The rich man was shocked at the idea of giving up the wealth that gave him leverage in the community, that insulated him from being unimportant, un-influential, no better than a beggar to be ignored.  Israel to whom Amos preached could not fathom the idea of relinquishing her military might and territorial acquisitions and so lose her leverage with the nations all around her.  Neither of them could let go of the security they had built for themselves and trust that God would hold them with more surety and security than they could ever construct on their own.  Better to be confident in the safety they knew than fling themselves into an unknown existence based on an ancient promise from God.

     Because God does not promise peace and prosperity, at least in the short term, nor are safety and security assured to us.  God may take us in new directions, along unfamiliar paths on which we might not otherwise choose to go.  We may be blown along by the wind of the Spirit, challenged and changed by unexpected experiences, thrown into brave new worlds we had never imagined.  We are practically assured that if we do let go of our earthly loves and follow Jesus, our lives will be turned upside-down.  But we are also assured that God will be with us, and that we will live and move and have our being wrapped safely in God’s love.

     And if we don’t?  Well, look at our nation today: in our quest for power and security we have devolved from a beacon of freedom and human rights into a bastion of aggression where civil liberties are imperiled and torture is acceptable.  Look at our Church, and the Anglican Communion: in the struggle to hold onto the “traditional” teachings and power structures, some are fighting to keep the community “pure” by keeping “them” out, whether “they” be gays and lesbians, women, liberals, or just people who think.  Imagine what our nation could be if we let go of our self-image as “savior of the world;” imagine what our Communion would be like if we let go of our fears and greed and took a chance by listening to what the Spirit may be trying to teach us.  Until we are willing to make these sacrifices, the potential of the Church, the nation, and the world will be forever unfulfilled – and each will walk away shocked, grieving, and mad as hell.

     Having heard so many times that “God is on our side,” I’ve come to realize how utterly false that always is.  I don’t think God is on anyone’s side but God’s, and the question is whether we are on God’s side.  I also have come to doubt that God uses the nations of the world as giant chess pieces, playing one against the other; and I don’t think God really cares that much whether the Anglican Communion splits up or not.  I believe that what God is truly concerned with is you and me, each of us as individuals, a few billion times over around the globe.  For that is the only place where real change can happen, it is only through individual human beings, transformed by God and joined into communities similarly transformed, that God’s will can take shape in the world.  And so we come back to the scene of the rich man, kneeling in the dust at Jesus’ feet, imploring him to help him break through with that final answer.

     Imagine yourself in that scene.  Imagine asking Jesus what you can do to inherit eternal life.  Imagine he tells you to give up that precious thing that holds you back from God.

     Will you do it?

     Amen.

         Back to Sermon Selections