angel

Sermons
 

    Sermon at The Church of the Holy Apostles, New York City
May 18, 2008, The First Sunday after Pentecost, Year A
The Reverend Elizabeth G. Maxwell, Associate Rector

Genesis 1:1-2:4a
Psalm 8
2 Corinthians 13:11-13
Matthew 28:16-20


In the name of God, the One in Three:
The Three who are over me,
The Three who are below me,
The Three who are above me here,
The Three who are above me yonder,
The Three who are in the earth,
The Three who are in the air,
The Three who are in heaven,
The Three who are in the great pouring sea:
The Trinity
B One, and undivided.

     This invocation with which I began is in the same spirit as that great hymn, ASt Patrick=s Breastplate,@ which we will sing later on.  They speak of God as Trinity, not abstract, but intimately present in everything, everywhere.  This feast day, which is about a doctrine B a theology B rather than telling part of a story, requires that we look for ways to bring what can often feel abstract down to earth, as it were.  It calls us to look for connections, images, resonances.

     And so, I was intrigued with the lectionary choice for our first lesson this morning, which was of course Genesis 1: the myth of the creation of the world and humankind.  What, I wondered, has this to do with the Trinity?  I have an intuition, though, that there are some very important themes here, in the deepest ecological sense.  The word Aecological@ comes from the Greek Aekos,@ the word for house or home.  It has the same root as Aecumenical.@  In this context, it asks how we are called to be at home in the triune God and how we are called to be at home on this earth, which Genesis celebrates as Avery good@-  how we are to be at home on our wondrous and grievously wounded blue planet.

     The first theme that emerges for me out of the feast of the Trinity and the reading from Genesis is the theme of unity in diversity:  interrelatedness, interdependence, Ainter-being,@ as one has said.  The Trinity is One in Three and Three in One B a pluralism in the profound unity that is God, God=s self.  The Trinity is first of all an attempt to speak of our experience of God.  The early Christians struggled to express the relationship between the God of the Torah and the prophets who was also the God of Jesus and their experience of God in Jesus, and then their experience that the God who was in Christ was also an ongoing presence in believers and in the community, indwelling them and empowering them to carry out Christ=s work.  The notion of Trinity as they worked it out logically in Greek philosophical categories can feel somewhat static to us.  But actually, the Trinity is full of movement.  One of the old images for the Triune God is a dance.

     Most of all, the notion of Trinity conveys a profound relatedness among the persons.  Following the ancient traditions, we at Holy Apostles say AFather, Son, and Holy Spirit@ to speak of the Trinity, to speak of this relatedness.  And then, attempting to expand our imaginations beyond the patriarchal language, we add: AMother of All.@  It=s a little ambiguous whether we mean the Holy Spirit, who=s often spoken of often as feminine, is the mother of all, or that God in God=s entire self is the mother of all.  Of course, God is beyond gender, but holds all the possibilities of gendering, all diversity within herself, in deepest harmony.

     There are some other ways of naming the Trinity that have gained commerce in recent times: Asource, word, and inspiration.@  That was in David=s hymn that we sang last week.  AGod unbegotten, God incarnate, and God among us.@  From the New Zealand prayer book: Aearth maker, pain bearer, life giver,@ and one of my very favorites, from Saint Augustine: Athe lover, the beloved, and the love between.@  This last image of the Trinity emphasizes that God is in God=s self relational, diverse but a deep unity, loving and beloved, and yearning, seeking and inviting us into that relationship of love, drawing us into the dance.

     While Genesis 1 is most assuredly not speaking of the Trinity, that divine dance and movement are discernable in the beginning.  God starts to create, and the rustling restless spirit/ breath/ wind hovers and moves over the deep dark waters.  God speaks and life bursts into being.  Order comes out of chaos; it=s wildly diverse and it all springs from the One.  It=s summoned up by the Word: the stars and the great sea monsters, fruit trees and fruit bats and fruit flies, rocks and rivers, microorganisms and mountains, giraffes and jellyfish, and red tail hawks and human kind.

     God declares it all very good, or as one translator says, AGod saw how good it was.@

     Genesis is poetry; it=s not science.  But science as we understand it in our day actually takes us deeper into the mystery of unity, diversity, and interdependence.  We understand that all of the universe came from a single explosion that we call the Big Bang, some 15 billion years ago.  We come from a common origin.  As the poet sang, AWe are stardust.@

  
Some 4 billion years ago earth emerged as the planet that can sustain life, and from the simplest cells, life evolved as an intricate web of relationships, entwined in food, in habitat, and adapting one being to another.  The more complex forms on our planet are far more vulnerable than and utterly dependent upon the simpler ones.  Our impacts on one another are so profound that as famously has been said: AThe flutter of a butterfly=s wings in the Amazon may cause a storm in the arctic.@

  
Theologically, we are invited also into the dance of creation, into a profound understanding of our kinship with all life, of awareness that ecologically we are at home together on this planet, intertwined and needing each other in ways that we don=t comprehend.  We are different, all we species, and wildly so, but we must claim kinship not only with other humans B challenging as that diversity is B but with other species, with the animals and plants, and even with the soil in which our food is grown and the water on which all life depends.  We are diverse and we are inextricably bound together in one whole.

     The second theme that emerges for me in reading Genesis 1 on Trinity Sunday is a cosmological context, Aour place in the family of things,@ as Mary Oliver says.  We need to learn to see ourselves in a more than human world B God=s world B and one that we share with more than human others.  In St. Patrick=s Breastplate, we sing an invocation of the Trinity, binding ourselves to the great One in Three.  And then we proceed to bind ourselves to the work of Christ, and to the saints throughout time and space, and then to the powers of the natural world: Athe flashing of the lightning free, the whirling wind=s tempestuous shocks, the stable earth, the deep salt sea, around the old eternal rocks.@

  
Imagine binding yourself to the lightning, to the wind.  Imagine learning from those great teachers.  The message of Genesis is that the earth is the Lord=s, God=s creation, not ours.  And it means to decentralize our insidious self-preoccupied anthropocentric perspective.  Even in the creation myth, humankind is a relatively late arrival, but to really get how infinitesimally brief our presence has been in the unfolding of the universe, I recommend that winding walk in the Museum of Natural History that shows us showing up at less than one minute to midnight.
 

     We marvel on the one hand that we belong here on this planet that has evolved to sustain us in life just as we need, for which we are suited along with all the others.  And, we are challenged to realize that this story of creation, this story of God in the world, is not all about us.  Now Genesis has a very mixed legacy of interpretation in this regard.  We are told that the human being is created in the divine image and given dominion over the other creatures.  Are we really the only species that bears the divine image?  I have to say I simply don=t believe it.  Elephants with their prodigious memories and loyalty, the birds who shelter their young under their wings, the mysterious canyons and the majestic oceanYsurely the divine is expressed through them and broods in them, and surely we are all B all- in the love that is the image of the Trinity, both indwelling and transcendent.

     But perhaps we might ponder how the divine image is uniquely in humans.  Is it reason?  Language?  Relatedness?  It seems that the more we learn about them, the more we find that other species share some of these characteristics and have their own unique intelligences.  Certainly they have unique instincts, abilities that we can only dream of sharing.  Surely many of them have a deep capacity for feeling.

     I think that the vocation of the human may have to do with consciousness, with self-awareness, with knowledge that we will die, and with our imaginations.  And we need these capacities in dealing with the other issue raised by Genesis 1, in which humankind is given dominion over all creation.  The legacy of this is disastrous, particularly as our technological capacities have grown, for we have treated the earth and the other species as if they exist solely for our use and entertainment B as if they are an Ait@ rather than a Athou.@  We can no longer avoid the consequences of this self-centered greed and myopia.  But what we really need is a shift in consciousness.  We need our imaginations to understand that if we are to exercise anything like dominion over others and the planet, it is as loving caretakers with humility and devotion B with recognition that God=s good creation exists in its own right and not solely for human consumption.

     We need our imaginations to envision how this might be different and how we might change, because we don=t have dominion in the sense of the right to take everything for ourselves.  But we do have responsibility to use our unique and prodigious capacities for the good of the whole.  We need to join in the dance of love that is at the heart of the Triune God.
 

     Theologian Sally McFague, to whom I am indebted for many of my thoughts about these matters, in her book The Body of God, quotes the novelist Iris Murdoch who says, ALove is the extremely difficult realization that something other than one=s self is real.@  Love is the extremely difficult realization that something other than one=s self is real.  The anguish of reading the headlines of the last two weeks challenges me prfoundly in this regard: first, the cyclone is Myanmar, then the earthquake in China, then the details of the food crisis unfolding all over the world and famine in sub-Saharan Africa.  All these crises are both human and ecological and the fact that we feel anguish is good news, a sign of our connectedness.  But we must ask how we can be responsible citizens of the Earth, lovers not only of our nearest human kin but of all our relations in this crisis time on our planet.

     Surely the answer must include our capacity for discovering and loving the reality of the other which is so easy to lose in sound bites, so easy to forget when the headlines go on to something else.  This extremely difficult realization that something other than ourselves is real has to be metabolized into a radically different way of seeing and being in the world.  Something other than ourselves is real.

     This brings me to the final theme that emerges for me from the juxtaposition of Genesis 1 with Trinity Sunday, and that theme is wonder.  This feast invites us to contemplate the inexhaustible mysteries of the Triune God.  It reminds us that all our formulations about God, all our images for God are provisional.  As the mystic Meister Eckhart said, ANot this, nor this, nor this, nor this art Thou, yet also this and this and this.@

  
This day invites our investigation of our own images for God, as those who were in Andrea=s class earlier this spring did.  Perhaps especially invited are the weird and even unsettling ones, our meditation on our own peculiar experiences of God.  Part of the divine image that we bear as humans is creativity in knowing, perceiving, imagining God- the creativity of an exuberantly passionate Creator, who continues to create and calls us into partnership in that creation for our flowering and for the desperate need of the whole.
 

     In that creativity, an essential nourishment for me is contemplation of the natural world.  We might remember to bind unto ourselves the powers of the sun, the winds and the waters, and also perhaps the undefended beauty of a blossom, the homing instinct of migrating birds, the rootedness of trees, the deliberateness of a tortoise, even the persistence of a mosquito.  Not only in the grandeur of wilderness but also in paying attention, really paying attention to a plant, a bird, a goldfish, and yes, another human being B in allowing fascination, the disorientation of discovery that they are real and different from us and also bone of our bone,  irreplaceably interdependent with us, part of one great whole B we find what we need to do the work we are called to do.

     I want to close with another poem that speaks with contemplative love about God and creation.  It=s not particularly trinitarian, but it does invite us into imagining anew our experience of the divine.  It=s a goodnight prayer written by a child named Danu Baxter, age four and a half.  It goes like this:

Goodnight, God
I hope that you are having
a good time being the world.
I like the world very much.
I=m glad you made the plants
and trees survive with the
rain and summers.
When summer is nearly near
the leaves begin to fall.
I hope you have a good time
being the world.
I like how God feels around
everyone in the world.
God, I am very happy that
I live on you.
Your arms clasp around the world.
I like you and your friends.
Every time I open my eyes
I see the gleaming sun.
I like the animals, the deer,
and us creatures of the world,
the mammals.
I love my dear friends.

     Perhaps that is the question that we must ask this Trinity Sunday: How shall we be loving friends of God and of Creation?

    
Amen.

.