angel

Sermons
 

Sermon at The Church of the Holy Apostles, New York City,
August 28, 2005, The Fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost, Year A
by The Reverend
Barry M. Signorelli

Jeremiah 15:15-21
Psalm 26:1-8
Romans 12:1-8
Matthew 16:21-27

May the words of my mouth, and the meditations of our hearts, be always acceptable in your sight, O Lord, our Strength, and our Redeemer.  Amen. 

Before I get down to the business at hand this morning, I want to say a word about the remarks made by the Rev. Pat Robertson last week on his TV show, “The 700 Club.”  As you no doubt have heard, the Rev. Mr. Robertson was discussing Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez’ stormy relationship with the United States government.  His remarks included the following: “[Chavez] has destroyed the Venezuelan economy, and he's going to make that a launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism all over the continent.  You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war.”  Mr. Robertson concluded, “We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.” 

These outrageous words would be startling coming from any American citizen, but from the mouth of a clergyman, especially one with such widespread influence and access, they can only call forth shock and repudiation.  Mr. Robertson claims to be a Christian, yet his comments belie the tenets of Judeo-Christian morality which he and his like say are the bedrock of our society (remember, “Thou shalt do no murder?”).  At best, they were irresponsible and ill-advised (and that’s being charitable); at worst, they are an apostasy to the loving Gospel of the Savior he claims to follow.  As a priest in Christ’s Holy Catholic Church, I condemn these hurtful, hateful words and pray that they will not lead astray the weak and misguided.  I understand that Mr. Robertson has apologized for this, and if he is truly repentant, then I must accept that and forgive him; but the horror of the sin itself must not be glossed over and excused. 

Yes, words can get you into trouble, as Peter found out in this morning’s Gospel.  Poor Peter – always trying so hard, desperate to get it right, and only managing it about half the time.  His rebuke by Jesus today is especially poignant, given that only moments before (in last week’s Gospel, actually), he had gotten it so right by correctly identifying Jesus as “the Messiah, the Christ of God.”  Jesus praised him, called him the Rock upon which he would build his Church, and metaphorically gave to him the keys to the kingdom of heaven.  Peter must have been riding high just then…until Jesus started describing to the disciples how the story would end, with Jesus’ own arrest and torture and crucifixion.  Peter, perhaps flushed with his recent success, jumped up and said, “No!  we can’t let that happen to you!”  Upon which Jesus rebuked him, saying, “Get thee behind me, Satan! …for you are setting your mind not on divine things but on human things.”  What a fury that was to burst upon the Rock. 

Now, we can surely understand Peter’s dilemma: he hears that the person he loves best is going to be in trouble, and he wants to head it off, keep it from occurring.  It’s what most of us, I hope, would be moved to do.  The problem is, having just recognized that Jesus participates fully in that which is beyond this world, Peter cannot move his own mind past the seeming-reality of his daily life; he senses that Jesus is the Son of God, but his reflexes still treat him as the wandering rabbi, the carpenter’s son.  It’s a problem common to us all: we treat God as if he were just another human person, (albeit with a lot more power); we assume that God takes sides and wreaks vengeance according to our personal grudges and hurts.  We hear and may believe words about selfless love and the immorality of war, yet we too often let temporal considerations color our judgement about what is acceptable, or at least unavoidable, behavior in the world.  We ply God with requests like children’s letters to Santa, asking for this or that, but too seldom asking God what God wants instead.  Even Paul, in the earliest days of the Christian community, has to remind the Church in Rome not to “be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God….”  After all, we live in this world of time and space 24 hours a day, it’s the only reality we know, or can remember – no wonder we expect that God and the infinity of heaven must be just like this, for it’s too hard to imagine anything else. 

But that is precisely what God calls us to do, to imagine something else.  After rebuking Peter, Jesus went on to explain to the disciples the perplexing paradox of living in God’s reality rather than our own: that by striving to save our lives, we actually lose them in the process, and that by losing our lives, we will find them.  Now, this just sounds like utter nonsense, doesn’t it?  Might we not also jump up and shout, “God forbid it, Lord!  This must never happen to us!”  But if we do, we should not be surprised when Jesus replies to us, “Get thee behind me, Satan.” 

There’s a reason it’s called a “leap of faith.”  God often requires that we jump off into the unknown with no clear sense of where we might land, or of the surety of success.  Living with our minds set on divine things is one long series of risk-taking, of going against what common sense is shouting at us.  It’s a learning curve, too; sometimes it takes a lot of risk-taking, a lot of faith-leaping with some very hard landings to get it right.  And it often means jumping off alone, being the odd one out, the one who doesn’t see things the same as everyone else.  Jeremiah knew this as well as anyone; in his lament that we heard today, he is yelling at God for revealing to him the joy of divine truth, God’s words which had become to him “a joy and the delight of [his] heart” – yet which had put him totally at odds with his people, to whom he sought to share such treasures.  His rejection by his sisters and brothers was like an incurable wound, unceasing pain, and God has become to him like waters that fail.  Again, the paradox: by following God’s word, we invite rejection; by recognizing the Christ, we condemn him to death.   

And even for all the risks we take that pan out favorably, there can be many that are just plain wrong.  Remember that Paul’s risk in reaching out to Gentiles like the Romans was preceded by his persecution of Jesus’ followers.  Sometimes we fail utterly, and take risks not out of faith and hope, but out of fear and self-protection, as when Peter denied his Master three times after Jesus’ arrest (the very event to which he so strongly – and wrongly – had objected).  Every time we take a risk, however well-intentioned, there is the inherent possibility of failure, of censure, of being misguided or morally blind.  But that hardly means that we should avoid taking any risks, for to do so would be to reject the infinite possibilities that God lays out for us; to avoid taking risks means never knowing what might have been; without taking risks, we become blind to God’s Kingdom, living solely in this fallen, imperfect world.  Satan prevails by instilling in us the fear of taking risks. 

For ultimately, we take each leap of faith by ourselves.  We may jump out from a community that supports us, or ignores us, or laughs at us; we may land in a community that is surprised, or angry, or welcoming, or complacent.  We can hope that, if we’ve read things correctly and have leapt at God’s beckoning, that we will end up among others who understand and love us, regardless of our “success,” but that won’t always be the case – and in any event, we fly through the unknown alone, and that can be very scary.  Well, actually, it turns out we don’t leap alone, after all – for God is constantly there with us, whether our risks are well- or ill-advised.  God promised Jeremiah that if he were faithful, he would prevail against his detractors, and the people would come to him.  Jesus appeared to Saul on the road to Damascus and invited him to take the risk that redeemed his life.  And for the three denials Peter uttered during the Passion, Jesus later offered him the chance to give three affirmations of love after the Resurrection.  When we take a leap of faith, God flies through the air with us. 

But how, then, do we judge the quality of our motivation in taking risks?  It could be argued that Pat Robertson was taking a risk with his unorthodox comments – why should his risk-taking be condemned?  Because it violated the one standard that is inviolate: the Gospel of unconditional and selfless love which Jesus came to teach us.  If we cling to that one Truth in all our actions, if we measure all our thoughts and deeds against that model of life, then we can safely leap into the unknown, assured that God goes with us, even when we’re wrong; for such is how God’s will is worked on earth.  The greatest risk, it seems, is not taking one. 

Amen.


   Back to Sermon Selections