|
Sermon at The Church of
the Holy Apostles, New York City,
August 20, 2006, The Eleventh Sunday of Pentecost:
Year B
by The Reverend Peter R. Carey
Proverbs 9: 1 - 6
Psalm 147
Ephesians 5: 15 - 20
John 6: 53 - 59
In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Spirit. Amen.
I was born into an Irish-American family and that
meant, in the 1930s at least, into a family that didn’t understand
very much about food. What we ate wasn’t bad, but it was quite
plain and repetitious and rather bland.
Things didn’t improve for me when I went away to
college in the 50’s. College dining halls weren’t known in those
days--and probably still aren’t--for their fine cuisine. When I
entered the Dominican Order, in 1959, things in the food
department continued to remain pretty bleak. The women who
prepared the meals for the Dominican fathers and brothers were
Dominican sisters, most of whom, like me, came from Irish-American
backgrounds.
Then in 1969 I was sent to Rome to begin my
postgraduate studies and after I’d been in Europe for a while I
said to myself, “Wow! So this is what all the fuss is about! This
is what food is!” And after that discovery, believe me, I never
turned back.
My journey toward real food parallels my journey toward
St. John’s gospel. When I was a young student of theology and
scripture, I used to say that I didn’t much like John’s gospel. It
was too rich for my blood. It was too “mystical” somehow and I
knew I didn’t have a mystical bone in my body. It was too poetic
and metaphorical and too full of mumbo jumbo. Give me the old
plain-speaking synoptics-- Matthew, Mark, and Luke--any day.
But in later years, especially after I began to have to
preach on John’s gospel, I grew first to respect it and then to
love it.
This is not to say that I have ever found John the
Evangelist easy going. I haven’t and he isn’t, but I have found
him worth the effort. Well worth the effort. I have found him to
be nutritious and even delicious food for the soul.
When comparing John’s gospel to the other three, it is
often pointed out that the synoptics focus more on telling the
story of Jesus’ life in a more or less chronological way and less
on explaining the significance of our Lord’s life and death and
resurrection. John, on the other hand, digs deeply into the
meaning of Jesus’ life and death and doesn’t seem to care as much
about chronology. This is what makes the synopics easier going
than John and this is what makes John sound so different from the
synoptics.
But this is obviously an over simplification. There is
plenty of chronology in John, just as there is plenty of theology
in the synoptics.
This morning’s reading from the Gospel of John is an
excellent example of Johannine theology: challenging, difficult to
understand, deep, rich, and satisfying.
In today’s gospel passage Jesus says: “Truly truly I
say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink
his blood, you have no life in you.”
When you first hear that passage, it is troubling. It
may even sound like Jesus is talking about some kind of
cannibalism. “Eat my flesh. Drink my blood.”
Well, not really. It is in the verses that precede
today’s reading that Jesus first makes the claim that his
disciples must “eat his flesh”: “The bread which I shall give for
the life of the world is my flesh,” he says.
Jesus’ listeners who heard him make this claim did not
suppose that he was proposing cannibalism. There is no hint of
that in the gospel. They knew that he was speaking in some way
figuratively. What shocked them was Jesus’ claim that he was the
bread of heaven, that he came down from heaven, just as in times
past manna had come down from heaven to feed the Jews on their
journey to the promised land. “Your ancestors ate and died, but
the one who eats this bread will live forever.”
This is what scandalizes the Jews and so they ask, “How
can this be?” They think he’s too big for his britches, if not
downright blasphemous. Isn’t he just Joseph and Mary’s kid from
Nazareth? Precocious, maybe, but, hay, this going too far!
But Jesus doesn’t back down. He repeats and presses his
claim even more. “He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has
eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.”
So, if we are not to think that these verses are a call
to cannibalism, we are still left with the problem of
understanding what Jesus meant by “eat my flesh” and to understand
why Jesus in this gospel says that in order to have eternal life
we need to eat his flesh and to drink his blood.
To understand the meaning of “flesh” in John’s
theology, we need to turn to the opening words of his gospel: “In
the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word
was God..... And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.”
The Word was made flesh.
The Greek word for “flesh” chosen by John is sarx and
it means the fullness of humanity. If John had wanted to say that
the Word of God took on a human body, he would have used the word
soma. But sarx is not just a body, but everything that makes a
human being human--memory and intelligence and emotion, human
weakness and human strength, like altruism and love and courage
and fear and discouragement and joy and pain and
pleasure--everything that goes into making us human. It was in
that deep sense that God Incarnate became flesh and blood.
So when John says that the Word was made flesh, he is
saying that God became truly and fully and completely human. And
when Jesus says, “The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood
abides in me and I in him” he is saying that the act of eating his
flesh puts us into contact with Christ on the deepest and fullest
level of our being.
So deeply and so fully that the those who eat his flesh
and drink his blood can be said to abide in him, and he in them.
And when two people abide in each other, dwell intimately with
each other, are in profound relationship with each other they
share with each other.
Thus, when we eat Christ’s flesh and drink his blood in
the blessed bread and wine of the Eucharist we come into contact
with him on the deepest possible level of our existence.
As we eat the bread and drink the wine of the
Eucharist, Christ himself becomes a part of us. His body becomes a
part of our bodies, his blood a part of our blood. And we become a
part of Christ in such a way that we share in his life and in his
holiness.
On this level of mysterious but real interconnectedness
Christ shares his gifts with us. He give us eternal life now in
the present and resurrection in the life of the world to come. “He
who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will
raise them up on the last day.”
Only Jesus Christ can offer such gifts to those who
come to him in this way because only God in Christ, has them to
offer.
In our culture we are bombarded all the time by
advertise- ments for things that are supposed to meet our deepest
needs. But they all fall short. No new car, no miracle diet, no
trip to Paris, no big bank account, no swanky address can
ultimately satisfy us. They all fall short. “O God you have
created us for yourself,” said St. Augustine, “and our hearts are
restless, until they find their rest in you.”
In the Eucharist we find our rest in Christ. We come to
him just as we are. Human, weak, afraid. And he recognizes us and
speaks to us by name because he is one of us. To him all hearts
are open, all desires known, and from him no secrets are hid. He
feeds us with spiritual food in the Sacrament of his Body and
Blood. He sends us then into the world in peace. And on the last
day, he will raise us up.
Amen.
Back to Sermon Selections |