angel

Sermons
 

    Sermon at The Church of the Holy Apostles, New York City
April 20, 2008, The Fifth Sunday of Easter, Year A
Cheryl Fox

Acts 7:55-60
Psalm 31
1 Peter 2:1-10
John 14:1-14

 

     ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’

     If there’s one sentence that that expresses what was responsible for keeping me away from the church for 25 years, it’s this last one. So, it’s a bit ironic that this passage is the one I draw for my first Sunday morning up here. I actually thought of avoiding it, but I think we owe it to ourselves, and to God, to wrestle with the hard questions.

     The sentence ‘no one comes to the Father except through me’ has always made me feel wary; in fact, it bothered me so much that it made the whole Bible seem incomprehensible.

     I guess I approached the Bible like I approached modern art. I loved the more traditional works—the kind that are easy to identify as something I know. Not necessarily like a photograph, but something with parts that I can recognize, that make it easy to see what it’s all about. I would look at abstract art and not know what I was supposed to be looking at.

     I lived the five years or so before I came to New York in Las Vegas. Now, Las Vegas offers some things that one doesn’t easily find elsewhere, but world class art museums aren’t one of those things. So, when Tex and I saw that Steve Wynn, who was then the owner of the Bellagio, had his personal collection of artwork on display there, we went to see it. I didn’t expect much—and it was very small by Met standards. But it had those recordings you carry around that explain each piece, and at one of the modern works, the narrator said something like, ‘don’t look at the particulars there. Just notice how you feel when you’re looking the whole work, and let that lead you.’ No one had ever said that to me about art. It was an epiphany for me. The parts are essential, but they all together lead to the meaning of the whole. And, my instinctual reaction was the conduit.

     As I’ve gotten older, I notice that many times in my life when I’ve reasoned myself out of valuing my instincts, it’s been a mistake. I’ve learned to take them seriously. So, I paid attention to my instincts recently when I saw a particular full page ad in the first section of the Times. The page was titled ‘The Gospel and the Jewish People, an Evangelical Statement.’ It was taken out by the World Evangelical Alliance. Half the page was a statement, and the bottom half was a ‘partial’ [it said] list of people identifying themselves with the ideas expressed; this list included the director of the Billy Graham Center, various seminary presidents and professors, representatives of many faith groups including Anglican, Presbyterian, Baptist, Mennonite, and other Christian groups. The message was that, while they affirmed their friendship with the Jewish people, they still believe that [quote] ‘it is only through Jesus that all people can receive eternal life…we believe that salvation is only found in Jesus, the Messiah of Israel and Savior of the World.’ These folks spent a lot of money to spread this message. It seems that it’s very important to them to let everyone know that Jesus is the only way to salvation. It seems very important that everyone know that they’re right and the Jews are wrong.

     I’m pretty sure that if we ask the signers for a scriptural basis for this statement, they would include our passage from John. ‘No one comes to the Father except through me.’ It sounds quite clear and quite obvious. Yet, I get a knot in my stomach when I read this. We all hear scripture through the lens of our worldview, and for me, this just doesn’t sound like good news…the words I hear are painting a picture of division and exclusion. I hear the “we’re right and you’re wrong” that so easily slides into ‘us’ against ‘them’. I have a gut reaction that such boundary-setting leads to exclusivism, and that often leads to hurtful, destructive behavior. We might conjure up images of the Crusades, of Catholics burning heretics at the stake, Catholics and Protestants in Ireland killing each other, Nazis persecuting Jews, Jews and Palestinians killing each other, or even suicide bombers flying planes into the World Trade Center. Christian against Christian as well as faith group against faith group; this mindset leads to discrimination by race, gender, sexual orientation—so many examples of neighbor against neighbor.

     Yet, there are plenty of examples of such attitudes and actions in the Bible. Both the Old and the New Testaments are the stories of the formation of two faith groups, and there is much about boundaries, and who’s in and who’s out. There are many examples of attacks on those outside the boundaries. If one focuses on these parts, it’s surely possible to get a picture of a God who rewards the favored by condemning or destroying the non-favored ‘other.’

     But they aren’t the whole of our picture. There are other pieces that seem quite different. In our passage, Jesus is trying to prepare his disciples for his approaching death. A few verses earlier he told them ‘where I am going, you cannot come, but you will follow afterward.’ As usual, they didn’t understand what he meant. And, they are worried. Upset. Jesus is trying to comfort them. ‘Do not let your hearts be troubled.’ We feel the love as Jesus tries to explain the unexplainable: ‘I go and prepare a place for you…I will come again and will take you to myself, so that where I am, there you may be also.’ Promises of peace, and a future with Christ. But, we can just see that they still look troubled. They still don’t get it. Thomas states it: ‘Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?’ Jesus’ next words can comfort us today just as they comfort the disciples when heard as reassurance that we’re on way of Jesus: ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’ These are words spoken in private, spoken to and for the disciples out of love and caring. With them he was trying to guide those he knew so well through an impossible time.

     The community of John consisted of Jews who, because they believed Jesus was the Messiah, were being shut out of what they considered to be their community. They were in the process of establishing their identity and justifying their own boundaries, and would struggle to define themselves when Jesus was no longer there. Being on the outside hurts; Jesus’ words would comfort them and give them strength. So perhaps we can see this language through the lens of hurt.

     But, in looking at the whole canvas of John’s gospel, we’re led by images of Jesus not only as the Way, the Truth and the Life, but also as the good shepherd, and the light of the world—positive, expansive, embracing images. Surely Jesus’ private language here doesn’t mean to do the very thing that was causing this community so much hurt. Could Jesus really have been looking towards an exclusive club for salvation; intending that they make boundaries that do the very thing that was causing them so much pain?

     There are examples in scripture of God working outside the boundaries. God visits Hagar in the desert and promises to make a great nation of Ishmael; Muslims see their beginnings there. During his life on earth, Jesus reached out in love, healing and forgiveness to all kinds of people; those who didn’t believe in him as well as those who did, those outside the boundaries of his community as well as within. Samaritans—a group definitely on the outside—are the focus of at least a couple of Jesus stories.

     A doctor who worked in the hospital where I did my student chaplaincy training last summer was Muslim. She spoke to us about Islam, so we could better minister to Muslims in the hospital. As she spoke, it was impossible not to hear God speaking and acting through her. She was living the Word of God. She didn’t call it Christ, but she sought the same God we seek. And—she acted in the world in a way none of us could distinguish from a Christian understanding of how Jesus showed us to live. Her love seemed to break down any boundary we might have been trying to maintain.

     Jesus tells us: ‘In my Father’s house there are many dwelling places.’ Surely this is an image of inclusivity rather than exclusivity. ‘No one comes to the Father except through me.’

     Does the question have to be whether or not others are saved? That’s for God to decide, not us.

     In struggling with the tension of this message of love and inclusion and boundaries—we could also seek to redefine our own community. Not as a way of reassuring ourselves of our place with God. Not as a way of excluding others, but as defining our identity by being sure that others really can see Christ here in us. A community defined by its very expansiveness. If we have enough of a sense of our own distinctiveness in the positive, outward reaching love that Christ proclaims, others will be irresistibly drawn to us and to our vision.

     Boundaries and identity are part of our scriptural canvas. But the frame that holds together the parts is love: love of God and love of other. The canvas I see is an image rich in embrace of the other, in healing and reconciliation in God’s kingdom—both here with us now and in hope of a future with Christ. Even so, God’s vision is so much greater than what we can imagine.

     In Christ we know the Way, the Truth and the Life. God’s story continues, and in it there is room for all creation. Thanks be to God.

.